At first glance this is a very lovely photograph, but upon further inspection I see quite a few things that could be improved upon that would have made a better impact and feel.
First off it does appear as if she is wearing lipstick, a large amount of mascara, foundation and that her eye-brows have been defined. Also, it appears as though during the editing you air brushed her body. Also, you can see the roots of her natural hair color.
When I think "farmers daughter" I think of someone more natural looking, looking innocent and naughty.
You definitively captured the naughty part of what most people might think of when thinking of a farm girl, though I believe having the make-up lighter and her looking a little more natural would have helped to the over all feel of the photo.
Okay so first off I love this picture. It's just perfect. My only problem would have to be her lipstick (granted it's pretty on her) but its just a shade too light to go with the picture. Her skin and shirt kind of fade into the background. And her hair kind of fades as well. I see her face when i look at this picture (not her boobs, I am a woman so...boobs really aren't my style) This girl is beautiful and I think the only thing you'd really need to add is maybe a bit of a darker color of lipstick to make her lips pop out. Everything else about her is fine, but I think if the lips had popped out the picture would have been better! Overall great picture!!!!!!
If people don't believe in Love At First Sight, they obviously haven't seen this beautiful creature of Earth!! She is absolutely gorgeous!! Those Eyes!! (And I'm a Brunette fan... not really a Blonde fan... until now!!)
Also, you have captured this shot perfectly!!! I am loving the light and mood!!
So now it's considered porn or degrading for women to show off cleavage in a top? She's not even naked, not showing even showing any nipple or private parts but apparently this is porn? There are no sexual parts on display and no intercourse and last time I checked that's what porn is, sex! Also those plastic comments you really can't be serious? Her breasts are natural, it's just the pose, angle and the type of bra she has on and the fact she could just have really perky breasts. How do I know? My friend has natural breasts just like these plus I'm also female and know some certain bras = massive cleavage. The skin is photoshopped as well so no she hasn't over done it with her make up, a lot of photographers do use photoshop on their model's skins. Also the whole "she doesn't look like a farmer's daughter" as the photographer has said it's a humours title and my step dad is a farmer and I sure don't look like the typical farmer's daughter type. But I guess you could say she's rebelling against her farther and she is the naughty type of girl or like me she just doesn't fit into that lifestyle.
Sorry for the long comment Piddling, but some of these comments are just, ugh I can't even think of a word for it but they annoyed me to a boiling point this time. I personally love this photo, the lighting and the model are just gorgeous. I also really love her top first thing I noticed, it's just so pretty!
well it seems that some people see a popular artwork and just want to say their opinion because its the only way that people might pay attention.... im not a fan of glamour shots like this, if u check my gallery. that doesnt mean i dont appreciate it when its done descently
People are allowed to have an opinion but they don't need to be so rude about it. I did have a look at your gallery and wow I'm really impressed, you're very creative at your work. I just hope these other people have a look as well and not assume this is all you do.
Remember, no one get near her or her daddy will come with his shotgun and chase you off and then you get away and he slams his hat on the ground and jumps on it saying: "DANG NABBIT!" and then later regrets it because he ruined his own hat.
It's difficult to just say "NO" to a photo where the girl is obviously quite beautiful, the scenery is lovely, and the lighting is well done, but the concept is so far off-base that it's a little discomforting. But in the end, I've managed. While you have obvious skill with your medium and some lovely models at your disposal, when you title this particular work as "Farmer's Daughter", it becomes misleading when looking at the work itself.
I think the concept of a farmer's daughter is supposed to portray a more honest, natural, and subtle charm; the romanticized thought of the hard-working, blue-jean wearing, blue-collar beauty. You'd be hard pressed to find an actual farmer's daughter kneeling in a field - with what? What is that? A thong, of some sort? And a see-through top? - half naked and perfectly done-up. Where's the raw beauty? Where's the charming in hair or two out of place? What about her exactly makes another person think it's a farmer's daughter if you took away the title?
Obviously for a photo op, things will tend to be stylized, but I think your message didn't come across, and you missed the entire concept. And when you miss the entire concept, you just have a half-naked broad kneeling in a field, looking totally out of place, and not the farmer's daughter you were looking for. It's not porn, but it's walking a fine line and is too racy for the setting and topic.
The picture is pretty, but nothing more - although apparently a pretty picture and gigantic breasts are enough to appease the masses. (No disrespect intended, that's only my humble opinion.)
oh i know, but it never really does affect any thing because theres tons of pictures like these(not referring to the photography but the content) on deviantART so just adding a mature tag will keep it out of underaged people
so i'll leave it at that and i didn't mean to disrespect your photography or the model sorry
i guess its very easy to go to a porn website, and watch porn, so i suppose a photo in DA with a girl that actually doesnt show anything wont do any difference. Also i believe this is healthy even for underage people who join an art community
well you do have a point, I have to say the work put into it(such as the photography and modelling) is impressive and can me considered as an "art"(porn to others) so I respect that and she isn't stark naked so it isn't that bad. plus it was featured on th front page so it has to be popular haha
wow, i ve noticed that 1 out of 100 americans, has a sense of humor. Well done, u are 1%. Its weird,when time here in Greece goes like 10pm its time that americans start to comment, and europeans, go to bed... its so funny to notice the difference in comments, and how puritan + without humor are... this might sound as a stereotype, but its like common everytime i post a provocative photo